NEW ZEALAND POTTERY
Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
Latest topics
» Studio Ceramics wall swan...
Nicholson Park, early duo with 739 saucer EmptyToday at 18:31 by Kotuku

» Studio ceramics " bugger mugs " plate
Nicholson Park, early duo with 739 saucer EmptyToday at 6:28 by JanPots

» Pottery marks
Nicholson Park, early duo with 739 saucer EmptyYesterday at 19:01 by Bold90s

» Neil Grant
Nicholson Park, early duo with 739 saucer EmptyYesterday at 12:51 by Ev

» Orange and Brown amazing pattern
Nicholson Park, early duo with 739 saucer EmptyWed 8 May - 7:51 by Ev

» Glenn Beattie
Nicholson Park, early duo with 739 saucer EmptyWed 8 May - 7:40 by Ev

» Rancich/Silva Shape 58
Nicholson Park, early duo with 739 saucer EmptyMon 6 May - 14:46 by JanPots

» NOT a Sherwood Pottery Galleon, as Made in Japan
Nicholson Park, early duo with 739 saucer EmptyMon 6 May - 8:45 by Ev

» Minna Bondy
Nicholson Park, early duo with 739 saucer EmptySun 5 May - 7:29 by Ev

Nicholson Park, early duo with 739 saucer

Go down

Nicholson Park, early duo with 739 saucer Empty Nicholson Park, early duo with 739 saucer

Post  Jeremy Ashford Thu 14 Jan - 14:37

original title:
what was the first cup to use a 739 saucer?

We already have "Hancock's" and we already have the 739 saucer.
What surprises me here is that this 739 has a 48-55 backstamp.
I didn't realise that they were made that early.
Nicholson Park, early duo with 739 saucer 7394810

I do not recall seeing a vitrified 755 Carlton cup with this backstamp, ie so early, and I believe the 863 tulips were made from the 781 mould (in the early 1960s) so I'm curious to know what cup would have been used. Jim's small one with a pointy handle has the same backstamp, but the measurements show a 48mm footring which is just too big. Here it is:
Nicholson Park, early duo with 739 saucer Smalcc10
53mm H x 82OD top x 48 footring
https://www.newzealandpottery.net/t6635-jim-s-small-vitrified-coffee-cup-1948-55#26264

So, does anyone have either a 755 Carlton cup with a 48-55 stamp, or any other vit cups that may fit? (I don't want a cup, I just want to know.)
.
---------
27/2/17
I just won one of these cups on tm complete with monogram-matched saucer:
http://www.trademe.co.nz/Browse/Listing.aspx?id=1270355910

It looks as though it will turn out to be a 739 but I will just have to wait until the end of the week (hopefully it arrives by then) to find out.

I'd like to swap for Jim's plain cup but this topic tells me I probably don't have a 48-55 739 saucer without a monogram. Bah!


Last edited by Jeremy Ashford on Thu 2 Mar - 19:02; edited 1 time in total
Jeremy Ashford
Jeremy Ashford

Number of posts : 3193
Location : Whangarei, New Zealand
Registration date : 2010-09-11

Back to top Go down

Nicholson Park, early duo with 739 saucer Empty matched duo, Nicholson Park monograms

Post  Jeremy Ashford Thu 2 Mar - 18:48

Nicholson Park, early duo with 739 saucer Nichol11
Nicholson Park Women's Bowling Club Auckland
unknown cup shape with 739 saucer, 48-55 backstamp

In the absence of documentary evidence, the most reliable way to match cup and saucer shapes is to obtain a matched pair, that is a pair with matched backstamps, and matched pattern or monogram.

In the original post I speculated that a likely contender for earliest cup to match the 739 saucer could be the unnumbered cup with vitrified "Carlton" cup body and unique handle first seen in a photo from Jim Brock's collection.

This find of a pair with the same green 1948-55 Crown Lynn Vitrified backstamp and matched monograms appears to confirm that speculation. At time of writing I cannot remember if I have yet located a 755 vitrified Carlton cup with the same or earlier backstamp.
Nicholson Park, early duo with 739 saucer Nichol10
Jeremy Ashford
Jeremy Ashford

Number of posts : 3193
Location : Whangarei, New Zealand
Registration date : 2010-09-11

Back to top Go down

Back to top


 
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum